Marijuana reform has been gaining momentum throughout the country lately. One of the problems that arises from such a dramatic shift in the legislation is the effect that marijuana legalisation will bring on DUI rules, which is barely debated.
If marijuana reform gains momentum, there are two questions that need to be addressed when it comes to marijuana DUI situations, in my view. The first question is if Marijuana has a legal cap, and the second is whether both active and inactive levels of Marijuana will be criminalised.If you’re looking for more tips What are the Pros and Cons of Marijuana Legalization?
The first question to be asked is when the legal limit would be. Several jurisdictions in the United States have passed per se rules for marijuana DUI situations, which means they have set a legal cap. There is a 2 nanogram cap in Nevada and Ohio, for example. In other terms, it is their version of a.08 blood alcohol content for DUI charges including alcohol. According to my study, Nevada’s stringent per se regulations resulted in a 76 percent rise in marijuana DUI convictions, although Ohio’s passage of these laws resulted in a 4.8 percent decrease.
The second concern to be answered is when both active THC and its inactive metabolite can be regarded as illicit drugs. Those states with per se DUI laws have often generated a higher amount of inactive THC metabolite, owing to the fact that the longer it lasts in the environment, the less effect it has on a person’s ability to drive. Nevada and Ohio, for example, have a 10 nanogram cap on the inactive metabolite.
If these questions are not resolved, this field of law would appear to be quite murky when it comes to DUIs, in my view. In reality, if I serve someone charged with a Marijuana DUI, it seems that various prosecutors have different ideas about when Marijuana begins to affect the person. The prosecution normally hires a toxicologist to testify on the impact of marijuana on the human body and what levels are deemed impairing depending on several research.